1. The decision on the location
After several years studying alternative locations, the Portuguese Prime Minister, José Sócrates, announced yesterday that the new international Lisbon airport will be built in Alcochete, on the southern bank of the Tagus river.
The decision to change the location of the new Lisbon airport was taken following the presentation of a comparative study prepared by the National Laboratory of Civil Engineering (Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil – LNEC), which concluded that the new location would be preferable to OTA, which was the location where the airport was to be built.
According to LNEC, the choice of Alcochete is preferable to OTA in four of seven criteria, namely, air safety, sustainability of the natural resources, social and economic growth and competitiveness and financial costs. OTA only overcame Alcochete in three categories: the preservation of natural environment and biodiversity, transportation facilities and existing accessibilities. According to the estimated made by LNEC, the construction of the new airport in Alcochete should cost €4.9 million, €200 million less than in the OTA project, which was estimated to cost €5.1 million.
2. Implications of the decision
The construction of the new Lisbon international airport in Alcochete will require changes to the route of the high-speed rail network, which had been planned on the assumption that the new infrastructure would be built on the northern bank of the Tagus.
The new location may also affect the European structural funds that had already been allocated to the original project. However, the Portuguese Government believes that the EU Commission will support the project.
The choice of Alcochete will also lead to the revision of the future location of the third crossing over the Tagus river, which is now expected to link Chelas and Barreiro. According to the Government’s briefing of yesterday, this new bridge will include a motorway and a high speed rail track.
3. Future developments
The Minister for Transport and Public Works announced that, although the construction works might commence later, the timetable should not be reviewed so that new airport is operational in 2017.
Following this announcement, the Government will commission a final study on the environmental impact of the construction of the new airport in Alcochete as required under Portuguese and European law.
In any case, it is unlikely that the Government would go back on this decision, as, according to various reports on the issue, although the construction of the new airport in the south bank of the Tagus the environmental impact of the project should be acceptable and can be mitigated.
© 2008 Macedo Vitorino & Associados
1. The facts
In 2005, the National Service of Fire-fighters and Civil Protection launched an international tender for the supply of forest fire fighting services involving the use of six helicopters and other related services.
Unlike other previous tenders, in which two different bidders – Aeronorte and Helisul – presented separate bids for these services, in 2005, these companies decided to create a consortium and presented a joint bid with a price increase of 93% in relation to 2004’s best bid.
As a result of the price increase, the Portuguese Government decided to annul the tender and to seek other solutions through the launching two new tenders using other types of fire fighting air equipment.
2. The procedure
After the press news concerning the annulment of the tender, the Portuguese Competition Authority decided to open an investigation to examine an alleged collusion involving the bidding consortium.
The Competition Authority concluded that Aeronorte and Helisul had presented a joint bid with the purpose of preventing, restricting and distorting the competition in the relevant market. The agreement leads to the elimination of the competitive pressure through the coordination and sharing between Aeronorte and Helisul of the supply of services and goods, the decrease in the number of bidders from two to one and an unjustified increase of the bid price.
3. The decision
Although the tender did not lead to a final award, the Competition Authority considered that this did not prevent the application of the Portuguese Competition Law and that the agreement entered into between Aeronorte and Helisul contravened article 4/1 the Portuguese Competition Law, as it prevented, restricted and distorted the competition to fix the prices and other commercial terms and conditions.
As a result, the Competition Authority applied fines of €179,933.38 to Aeronorte and €128,539.77 to Helisol, corresponding to 10% the annual aggregate turnover of each company, which is the maximum allowed by the Portuguese Competition Law.
Although it is expected that Aeronorte and Helisol will now appeal from the decision of Portuguese Competition Authority to the Commercial Court of Lisbon (Tribunal de Comércio de Lisboa), and whatever the outcome of this appeal might be, this decision opens a precedent in public procurement cartels evidencing the Competition Authority’s determination in fighting cartels and other restrictive practices in a series of decisions that defy the tradition of Portuguese regulators.
© 2007 Macedo Vitorino & Associados
A review by researchers at Brown University placed Portugal in the seventh position of the e-government strategy ranking. This review graded the governmental achievements in the use of information technologies regarding the exchange of information and services with citizens and companies.
The Brown University ranked 198 countries worldwide based on its e-government capability. To that purpose, the researchers analysed the governmental web sites according to several criteria, including available publications, databases, disability access, privacy, security and number of online services provided.
The seventh position achieved by Portugal is an outstanding result, especially when compared with the previous ranking, published in 2006. In one year, Portugal rose from the forty-eighth position to the seventh position and is presently the second best European country concerning e-government, following the Great Britain (in the 5th place). The highest places of the podium were awarded to South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and United States of America, respectively. Canada was sixth.
This accomplishment was especially due to the recent efforts of the Portuguese public authorities regarding the simplification of the public services’ procedures, namely through the programmes “Simplex” and “Ligar Portugal”. As a result of these programmes, it is now possible to request documents and public certificates online and to access to free online databases, such as the website of the official journal, containing the most recent statutes of law published. It was also created an electronic identity card, which gathers the relevant personal information in a single card, which will be rolled out in the coming years.
In what concerns businesses, the Portuguese Government has also approved a set of measures in order to simplify the activity of commercial undertakings and tax applications proceedings. Among other things, the programme “Empresa na Hora” has made it possible for investors to incorporate a corporation in a single day using electronic means and allowed the registration of trade names online. The filing of tax reports as well as of company reports can also be made online.
There are still many measures of the programme “Simplex” to be implemented in the future, which means that the Portuguese government will continue to promote the use of the e-Government tools to facilitate the life of its citizens and businesses. Among those measures, it is expected that the formalities for the acquisition of real estate will be simplified.
The restructuring of the Portuguese public services is creating a more favourable environment for investors in Portugal, by removing one of the traditional obstacles to the investment in our country. It is, therefore, likely that foreign companies will now consider Portugal a better place to invest.
© 2007 Macedo Vitorino & Associados
BCP has entered into an agreement with the Santander Group for the acquisition of its shares in BPI’s share capital. BCP also proposes to acquire the shares now held by its pension fund. If these transactions are cleared by the CMVM, BCP will acquire a total of 10.5% of BPI’s shares.
BCP will become the third largest shareholder of BPI with 12.1%, after the Spanish bank, La Caixa, and the Brazilian bank, Itaú, which have 25 % and 17.5% respectively.
La Caixa, Itaú and Allianz (which owns of 8.8% of BPI’s share capital) have announced that they will not sell their participations for the offered price of 5.70 euros per share. This group controls more than 50% of BPI and can block the amendments to BPI’s Articles of Association proposed by BCP, which require a 75% majority.
Under the agreements entered into with the Santander Group, BCP granted Banco Santander the option to acquire BPI branches and/or other assets that will be sold if the takeover bid is successful.
The legality of this agreement was questioned by BPI, which considers that it violates the obligation to treat all shareholders equally. BPI also considered that there is no legal justification for BCP increase its shareholding in BPI above the 10% limit that was set by the CMVM.
Although not all information is available, the purchase option granted to Santander may, in fact, result in the granting of an advantage to Santander – whose economic value is difficult to quantify – that could constitute a violation of the takeover bid rules under which the bidder has the obligation to offer an equal price to all of the oferee’s shareholders. As a result, the CMVM may consider that these agreements violate article 112 CodVM and require BCP to raise the offer price.
On the other hand, in May 2006 the CMVM authorised BCP to acquire over the counter BPI shares, provided that BCP’s position would not surpass 10% of BPI’s share capital and that the acquisition price were not higher than the offer price.
The CMVM must now decide whether BCP may exceed that percentage or whether, as BPI argues, there is no legal justification to allow BCP to buy more shares of BPI over the counter.
The CMVM’s decision on this case may have an impact in the success of the take over bid and also create a precedent for other takeover bids.
In particular, if this is allowed, Sonaecom could offer Banco Espírito Santo to retain it as Portugal Telecom’s main bank so as to bring BES to accept its offer for Portugal Telecom. With the recent increase of Sonaecom’s offer for Portugal Telecom to Eur. 10.50, BES seems to be the only obstacle to the success of the offer.
© 2007 Macedo Vitorino & Associados